This is What Women Think of Most Men…

For any of you who haven’t worked it out, pretty much all women have a very poor view of any man who isn’t “alpha” – which works out to be about 90% of men. This helps explain why on one hand, women bitch about the fictitious “Man Drought” yet at the same time there are huge numbers of single men in society. The advert in the following link really does a great job of reinforcing the point…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8teRxOSNHs

One of the commenters on the vid posted the following which is just gold….

This is just further proof that women despise beta males. If you want a girlfriend, you have to learn game. Even plain janes and butterfaces feel entitled to a slick-talking alpha male. Just look at all these single moms running around. They’d rather be living in poverty with an absent alpha’s kid than form a stable loving family with some boring lickspittle IT worker or accountant.”

Pretty much says it all.

This Man Handles His Wife’s Infidelity The Right Way

Here is yet another example of a woman cheating behind her hubby’s back…..

http://patriactionary.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/husband-of-woman-caught-canoodling-with-christian-congressman-vance-mcallister-says-he-has-wrecked-my-life-will-divorce/

No doubt turned on by the attentions of an “alpha” male, Melissa Peacock forgot her marital vows to her husband, Heath to get with Congressman, Vance McAllister. Whomever said women don’t think with their vaginas?

The ill-treated Mr Peacock blames the congressman for wrecking his marriage but this is only half true. As a commenter to the article points out, Peacock’s wife is equally to blame. The old motor applies…..

it takes two to tango

Blaming only the other man – in this case, the congressman – effectively absolves the adulterous wife of any wrongdoing when she is at least half of the problem. After all, Peacock’s wife has cheated on his and needs to carry the blame for that. Many men tend to blame the other man when their wives cheat without realising this fact. Also, it is quite possible in the Peacock’s case – amongst others – that the wife initiated the affair. We all know how much women love to climb onto alpha cocks, don’t we?

stop only blaming the other guy if your wife cheats on you, because she is equally guilty; stop absolving her of blame, because both adulterers are at fault when it happens.”

I know plenty of men who – as a function of absolution – have taken their adulterous wives back after their affairs. If you ever want to lose the respect of a woman and women in general, letting them know you will take them back after they hurt you in the worst way is a pretty good means to achieve it. Fortunately, it appears the good Mr Peacock is giving his missus the boot…..

We’re headed for divorce.”

Given the bullshit divorce laws in the USA, Mr Peacock is going to get himself ass-raped in the settlement which are always women-friendly; despite the fact that his wife is in the wrong and Mr Peacock is the innocent party. I suspect this is why so many women are unfaithful – it is a no lose situation all round. Given this, I have the greatest respect for Mr Peacock standing up for himself and I wish him all the best in the future. After all, it is not his fault he married a woman who turned out to be little better than a whore.

Some Women Want to Have It Both Ways…..

I’m not talking about double-penetrations either in case you have a dirty mind.

Have a look at the following link to reddit/mensrights…..

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/22b5cd/a_woman_complained_that_she_couldnt_use_the/

Essentially, because a couple of airhead females don’t feel comfortable using the weights area at their gym while there are men present, they expect the gym to take action to male them happy. To make matters worse, the gym management is considering having female-only hours to cater for these sort of bimbos. I have a problem with this whole situation on a number of levels….

a) the gym is obviously co-ed. The women would have known that when they joined up. If they had a problem with men being in the gym at the same time as them, why the fuck did they join a co-ed gym.

b) following on from the above point, the women could have Just as easily joined a female-only gym (such as curves). If they had of done that, problem solved as there would have been no problem in the first place.

c) men don’t have any option but to use co-ed gyms. Male-only establishments of any variety are barred by law. This being the case, the only option for men is not to go to the gym in the first place.

d) should the gym introduce female-only hours – effectively reducing the privileges that male members pay for – will they reduce the membership fees for males? I strongly fucking doubt it.

e) related to the above point, should the gym introduce female-only hours, will these hours be at the convenience of men or women? For example, at the gym I go to, the most popular times are between 5:30pm and 7:30pm weekdays. Assuming the same applies to the gym in question, will the female-only hours be booked to avoid this or will the men be expected to change their gym timetables to accommodate the whim of women?

f) will there be any democratic process involved. If there are a large number of women with the same complaint and only a few men who use the weights room (bloody unlikely given experience and the description in the link), there might be a case. However, if there is a large number of men who stand to be inconvenienced to appease the whims of a pair of women then the whole issue should die there and then.

The management of the gym needs to take a good hard look at the whole situation before they make any decisions they later regret. A local gym that I used to belong to make a similar decision to effectively discriminate against its male members in the hope of appeasing a small female minority. The end result was a loss of male members who happily moved to other gyms throughout the region whose management was smart enough not to discriminate against the majority of their memberships. To make matters worse for the offending gym in my area, the loss of male members (which was pretty fucking substantial) was in no way compensated by an increase in new female members. Logically, prospective female members preferred to either go to a fully female-only gym if they were that way inclined or they preferred to be in a co-ed environment. Basically, this proved to be a complete loss for the gym in question all around. I have heard that the female-only hours policy has since been reversed but I couldn’t give two shits; I am happy at the gym I relocated to and have no intention of going back.

The moral of the story is that being female friendly is one thing but being antagonistic towards males is another. Every decision we make in life has consequences.

Thoughts on Men’s (Lack of) Respect for Women

It should come as no great surprise that modern women experience a widespread lack of respect from the male gender. This has been documented in many and varied forms from the writings of feminist newspaper columnists to the proclamations of Barack Obama, the president of the USA. Basically, I agree – women do suffer from a general lack of respect from the male gender. Where I disagree with many pundits is in two main points: firstly, that  women are not automatically entitled to respect from men just because they are women and secondly, the overwhelming majority of men are not misogynistic sociopaths to whom disrespecting women comes naturally.

One of the common threads from left-wing elements is that men should respect women basically because they are women. Whilst that is good and well in theory, the reality is that no one expects women to respect men just because they are men. The lack of respect most women have for men is quite obvious. Male-bashing is a common enough theme is the popular media and who hasn’t had to put up with some misandric feminist ranting on about all the men whom she has fucked with that she hates? Gentle hint: if you want people to respect you, try treating them with respect first. Better yet, treat others as you would have them respect you. Most women seem oblivious to this but how they treat others has a lot to do with how others will treat them. The other issue – related to the above – which women at large are equally oblivious to that most men seem to understand instinctively is that respect has to be earned. No-one is going to respect you because you are white or black, tall or short, male or female or whatever. People respect you when and only when you demonstrate to them that you are worthy of respect. I have never heard a man complain about this; men who want respect get off their asses and give those around them something to respect. Women never do this, preferring to sit around and whine how unfair the world is and how misogynistic men are because they aren’t automatically respected because they are women. Most women seem to think they are entitled to automatic respect because they are somehow special. I have news for any woman whom is actually self-deluded enough to believe this – whilst the major difference between men and women is that women have vaginas, this of itself does not make a woman special. There is nothing special about having a vagina. There is nothing inferior about having a vagina either and let us be clear on that point. However, in the same way that no man expects women or society at large to respect him because he has a penis, it is ludicrous for a woman to respect her because she has a vagina. If women want men to respect them, they need to earn it and therein lies the problem – few women in the modern era make any effort to earn the respect of men. I intend to come back to this point later.

A thought that came to me recently is that I suspect that few men enjoy living in a world full of women they have little reason to respect.Traditionally, women crafted their general presentation to the world in such a way as to earn the respect of men and to prove they had a valid function in society – this tended to be enforced by parents (ie mothers AND fathers) and was a general social expectation. That women of years gone were expected to have domestic and parenting skills was a great example of this. That women were expected to be highly chaste – often to the point of being virgins at marriage – another. Such refinements in the female gender gave men many reasons to respect women in days gone and women were respected indeed. Since the advent of feminism, women have become a whole new breed. Modern women commonly have little or no domestic skills. Sluthood is the preferred means of sexual expression for most modern women. Most modern women have no concept of commitment to marriage and are all too pleased to abandon a good man as soon as something – in their eyes – better comes along; not to mention that pretty much all women feel entitled to rob their husbands blind in divorce proceedings and ruin their ex-husband’s reputations with bogus allegations of domestic and child abuse. Modern women commonly have no concept or value of parenthood, choosing to raise their children without a father which is known to have disastrous effects on a child’s long-term wellbeing. In terms of sexual equality, modern practice hypocrisy at every turn: women’s only spaces abound whereas men’s only spaces are practically outlawed. Modern women expect to have affirmative action policies in the workplace to help them get jobs they otherwise would be unqualified for ahead of better qualified men. Modern women expect not to be legally punished for the same crimes that would see a man imprisoned for lengthy periods. Modern women expect to be able to be violent towards men yet expect that men should not be able to be able to defend themselves. Modern women expect to be able to be crass and revolting yet still have men treat them like ladies. The list goes on and on. Put simply, modern women are hypocrites and if there is one thing that will cause someone to lose respect for you, it is being a hypocrite. Men are expected to practice what they preach lest they be socially ostracised. Modern women expect to be able to say one thing and do another and have everyone applaud them and then wonder why men won’t have a bar of them.

If I had the option – which I don’t and probably never will – I would much prefer to live in a society of women who saw respect as privilege to be earned and whom actually gave a fuck what men thought of them. Were this to ever be the case, I would have no problem respecting the women in said society. I will go out on a limb here and suggest that most other men would be in the same boat. Personally, I dislike having to forgo marriage due to a complete lack of marriage-worthy women. I dislike not having children due a complete lack of women with mothering skills. I dislike not having female friends because most women are straight out cunty at the best of times. I could go on but ask any man you know (whom is not a mangina) and I’ll bet he agrees with most of what I have written. Men and women are naturally designed to be together in mutually respectful and complimentary relationships and society works best when this actually happens. Since the advent of feminism, any hint of mutual respect has gone out the window and women have brought the results of that on themselves.

The next time you hear some idiotic feminist rant on about the need to teach boys and men to respect women feel free to point out to her that there is an equal (if not greater) need to teach girls and women to earn the respect of the male gender in the first place.

Home Wreckers Should Be Named and Shamed

I was reading an article in a national newspaper on the life and times of the late (and great) Peter Brock as told from the perspective of his long-suffering wife, Bev. One of the issues in the story was the tendency for women to shamelessly throw themselves at her husband in the most inappropriate ways in the most inappropriate situations. Given that Brock was the eternal king of Australian motorsport, his status as an alpha male was unquestioned. Given this it is hardly surprising that most women wanted to be with him. What is surprising (or maybe not) is the lengths many women would go to in order to be with him. Bev Brock spoke of women elbowing her aside when she was in public with her husband. There was the reported incident of a woman trying to trap Brock in a toilet with her at Bathurst and so on. The facts are that men know the limits of pursuing others’ partners and don’t cross the line – if men breach said line, the public and social shaming is quick to arrive. On the other hand, women are given full social approval to wreck the marriages of others and their own all in the name of satisfying their own hypergamous urges. The very last people you will hear complain about women wrecking marriages are other women, most of whom see abandoning one man and stealing a man committed to another woman as fair game. If anything, most women will call anyone who criticises women for hypergamy as being a misogynist. A great example of this occurred in my social sphere as of late; a friend of mine – let’s call him John – discovered his wife had left him for another man she met on FaceBook. Never mind the timing was pathetic; just two days earlier, John had gotten off the operating table from life-saving cancer surgery – is that a caring, empathic wife or wot? Also never mind that the ex-wife was so keen to be with her new man she abandoned her only child and had no contact with said child for months afterwards. Justifiably, John and every male around him has a pretty dim view of John’s ex and her actions. Not surprisingly (sadly), most women who know of the whole affair make any and every excuse under the sun for the bitch ex-wife. Not only that, in the midst of a conversation on the topic, I heard one women call a man a misogynist for even to dare suggesting that the ex-wife had treated John pretty poorly. Just goes to show, women are fucking hypocrites when it comes to just about anything.

I propose that women who leave men without good reason or women who break up another woman’s marriage should be publicly named and shamed. There needs be an internet registry (with pictures) of these whores for the world to see. Home wreckers need to be treated as second-class citizens, denied things such as the right to vote, the right to hold a driver’s licence or passport as well as automatic loss of custody of their children. As is stands now, women are free to create misery at every turn with no consequence to themselves; why would they ever do any different? No-one ever holds women responsible for the results of their actions and it’s about fucking time we started.

Reflections on the “Ban Bossy” Campaign

I am currently watching a vid on YouTube of Jim Jefferies and Joe Rogan discussing the realities of the “Ban Bossy” campaign. I have linked to this below…….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEtdp4B3BJA&feature=youtu.be

There are a lot of nuggets in here. Take for example……

Most bossy women I know can’t get jobs.”

Damn right. Domineering shitheads of either gender need to learn some fucking manners before they get into the workplace.

Have a look at the vid and get an idea of what most men (ie sensible humans) actually think of the BB campaign.

The Stupidity Behind the “Ban Bossy” Campaign

Much has been said about the campaign started by Sheryl Sandberg to ban the term, “Bossy”; or at least to ban it being applied to females. Given the tendency for feminists to get on board with pointless and poorly thought out ideas, it should come as no surprise that the Ban Bossy (for women) campaign has gotten a fair bit of promotion via the femisphere. The basis of “Ban Bossy” is trying to ban the use of the word “bossy” to describe women who enjoy pushing others around in the workplace. Apparently, female sensibilities are so delicate that the merest criticism of their leadership style is likely to dissuade them from being leaders in the future. Please – are we fucking serious here? We men get criticised for being overbearing all the time and we never bat an eyelid; what man hasn’t been told to “Pull your fuckin’ head in!” at least once in their lifetime? Do you see men using this as an excuse to drop out of the rat-race? Fuck no – a man takes this in his stride and keeps on charging. Anyone who can’t handle criticism has no place in modern society and anyone in management who can’t handle criticism needs to step aside and let someone who can do the job properly. “Ban Bossy” is nothing more than an excuse to give women an easy ride to the top with zero accountability. Let’s face it, since when have women ever been about working hard for what they want?

The one thing no feminist (and probably no woman either) would consider is that a lot of women are bossy and like being in charge purely as an excuse to push people around. Of course, no woman would ever see this as being bossy, she would see this as being “strong” and “assertive”. Semantics aside, ordering people around because you can is being bossy and no amount of politically correct bullshit is ever going to change this. As I covered in the article in the below link…….

http://evilweasel.net/?p=1035

…few women have any idea how to conduct themselves in leadership roles. Most women in leadership have the approach of using aggression and threats to try to cower their subordinates into getting work do and then wonder why everyone under them hates their guts (hint: no one calls a supervisor they like “bossy”). I have met no end of women who get off on the power trip of being able to dish out commands like they are the Ten Commandments and the bullying anyone who doesn’t cater to their every whim. Do you think that kind of management produces results? If you do, you’re an idiot. Women with this kind of toxic leadership philosophy are the very ones that get labelled as “bossy”. If these women (and any other proponents of the “Ban Bossy” campaign) had any sense whatsoever, they would see that being labelled as bossy is a sign that they don’t have great leadership styles and that they (and not others around them) need to change. However, given that most women are completely solipsistic, this is never going to happen.

The truly idiotic thing is that the same leadership style which women expect to be celebrated for is exactly the same leadership style that women wouldn’t tolerate from men. Who would want to work for a man who was a bully who liked to throw his weight around? No one I know yet women expect to be able to do it to everyone else and they expect not to be criticised for it. The logic completely escapes me. Basically, the “Ban Bossy” campaign is nothing more than an excuse for women to justify the very gender-specific behaviours (by and large) that make them unsuitable for management. Newflash: being bossy does NOT make a woman strong, empowered or assertive. Rather it makes them domineering, aggressive and highly ineffective. Men around the world need to not only oppose the “Ban Bossy” campaign, they need to step up and label women as bossy when they see it. Men are expected not to use authority to push others around. It’s high about time women were held to the same standard.

I came across the following link on the “Ban Bossy” campaign. Feel free to have a look at what a more level-headed pundit thinks about the whole matter…..

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/ban-bossy-the-latest-progressive-bullcrap/

Rudov Owns Two Idiotic Bitches

I have been watching a fair bit of Mark Rudov’s material via YouTube lately. In the link below, Rudov takes on not one but two idiotic vagina-owners who can do little but scream and generally act hysterically in lieu of putting up any rational argument….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrH1Y7Jf59E

The following line from Rudov is a classic…..

When men are married to women who scream like you, they just want to die sooner!”

Mark Rudov is a Legend

Have a look at the following vid by Mark Rudov which pretty much sums up the reality of the modern woman…..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ii1-IN_MPLM

In this vid, Rudov comes out with a number of gems which are truly worthy of immortalisation….

Dating and marriage – by and large – is legal prostitution.”

Amen to that. The whole institutions of dating and marriage are nothing more than an excuse for women to dig into a men’s wallets and give little in return. Let’s face it, if you are going to pay for the “pleasure” of a woman’s company, you are better off paying for one with whom the outcome is predetermined. After all, it’s not like your wife/girlfriend cares about you either.

Men have to get out of the habit of paying for sex.”

Or at least get out of the habit of paying for sex under the guise that a woman actually loves them. I have no problem with men paying for sex from a woman whom is up front about being a prostitute; how much more honest can you get? I have a real problem with men effectively paying for sex from a woman who claims to love them but in reality is more interested in their money.

That’s why women love me; because I don’t pay for sex.”

Basically, when a guy shows he will lavish money and other related items on women because they are women, he is basically saying he is an easy target and you can bet the gold-diggers will come out of the woodwork. A man who is judicious about how he deals with and rewards women is a man women have no choice but to respect.

There are a lot of women who will absolutely not date anybody unless they get red carpets and fancy meals and why do men pursue them? It’s stupid.”

I agree. We seem to have reached a stage in society whereby women seem entitled to expect that men will open their wallets just to be in their company. Fuck that. If I were to ever give my time to a woman she can make it worth my while or piss off.

The Importance of Men’s Only Spaces

Of all of the great social institutions to have gone the way of the dodo thanks to the destructive philosophy of feminism, the near-elimination of men’s only spaces will go down as one of the most catastrophic for society. Whereas once men of all ages could congregate free of outside social influences and develop as men, now no such institution is allowed to exist. Given that younger men need mentoring to develop into the men who will take society forward, one wonder how this is supposed to happen in the modern world. It certainly can’t happen in the home given that many men have been removed from their children’s lives at the whim of their ex-wives or in many cases, young men are raised by irresponsible single moms that no man wanted to stay in a committed relationship with. There is a great article along these lines over at Return of Kings……

http://www.returnofkings.com/31620/why-women-and-gays-should-not-be-allowed-in-male-safe-spaces

Runsonmagic - the author of the RoK article lists two very good reasons why we need spaces for manly men that anyone else should keep the fuck out of……

1) Women Demand Male Spaces Be Changed

2) Women Do Not Allow Men In Female-Only Spaces

Actually, there were three reasons in the post but the third one related to gays. I have no problems with gays being in man-spaces so long as they keep their fucking mitts to themselves. But basically, the status quo is that women have complete largesse to invade male spaces but at the same time, are able to keep men out of their spaces. I have mentioned hypocrisy of the modern women to no end yet here we have another example of it. Women know that man-spaces are were boys are turned into men and by that I mean real men, not the weak, faggoty, mangina men that women claim to approve of. So what did women do in an effort to control masculinity? They petitioned for – and were granted – access to spaces formerly exclusive to men. And what do you think women did as soon as they got in there? They demanded men change the whole man-space concept to be more accepting of and friendly to women. From that point on, men had little forum to discuss ideas and concerns important to men free of female influence. To a degree, the online manosphere has gone some way towards correcting this but there are a lot of men in the world in need of guidance from red-pill men who are unaware of the manosphere. These men have basically nowhere they can turn for guidance and advice on male issues without having said guidance and advice filtered to suit the anti-male, feminist and politically correct mentality so prevalent in modern society.

Women – on the other hand – have no such problems. Females are no only allowed to have women’s only spaces, they are encouraged to do so. Have you ever wondered why feminists want to be able to exclude men? Much of it is to be able to spread their hateful feminist propaganda completely free of male censorship. Effectively, social spaces have be designed to supress the best in men and develop the worst in women and we all wonder why the world is going to hell.

Men need to create their own spaces within women shared spaces. When congregating in areas that women have forced themselves into - without being actually wanted – men need to make an effort to exclude women and make it clear their presence is undesired. Don’t invite women into male conversations and when women try to force their way in, men need to ignore such women as much as possible. When discussing issues pertinent to men – and there are many; think male suicide/ false paternity/ unfair child support arrangements/ positive discrimination in the workplace/ the decline in modern women to name a few) – and a woman chimes in with her dismissive bullshit, men need to advise the said woman that she is not part of the conversation and that she needs to mind her own fucking business. Basically, men need to become assertive enough that they refuse to be censured by women in what should be their domain.

There can be no doubt that the decline of the male-only arena has led to the decline in modern masculinity and as a result, society as well. Men owe it to the world to stand up and claim their space. If we don’t there will nothing left to stand up for.