Women Make Better Parents – Yeah, Sure They Do

There has been a decent coverage of the massacre in Cairns in today’s media. It turns out the mother allegedly did it. Read the story, a woman killed eight children – seven of which were her own. It would seem the Queensland police only came to this conclusion as they couldn’t find a man to hang the crimes on. As we know, women are never guilty of violence and are always the best suited for looking after children – especially their own. Excuse me whilst I turn my sarcasm simulator off. Can we get away from this fraudulent assumption once and for all – women are not automatically better parents than men by dent of their gender and this has been demonstrated time and time again throughout history. This latest tragedy is but an example of that.

What concerns me is that excuses will be made to “explain” and more importantly, justify why a mother can kill her own children. I expect the usual culprits of PMS, BPD, postpartum depression and depression in general will be raised. No doubt someone will question whether the women was sexually abused as a child and whatever else can possibly be thought of. Whatever excuse or rationale will be raised to protect this women from the consequences of her crime, you can bet that had a man killed eight children (seven being his own) no-one would be offering excuses – and rightly so. Had the police managed to pin these crimes on a man, society and the media would be calling for the death penalty (as they should) and no-one would give two fucks as to why he did it. Given that men are expected to take responsibility for their actions, this is the way of things and that is how it should be. Women – on the other hand – are allowed to wallow in perpetual victimhood (when it suits them) to escape responsibility for their crimes. Not only that, but society and the media encourage them to do it. I can not remember one incidence whereby a woman accused of a heinous crime was treated with the same contempt and disdain a man would have been. I can remember no end of incidents whereby women have committed crimes in cold blood and have not faced consequences on the most flimsy of excuses. The whole reason we have a penal system is to discourage people with little regard for the rights of others from trespassing against others in the first place. Take away the discouragement and is it any surprise that certain elements of society fall to the basest levels?

Society at large and men in particular need to be calling for an end to the protected status of women in modern society – more so if said women expect to enjoy all the same rights and entitlements as men. If women want to be treated with special exemption from the responsibilities of society due to their gender then they need to accept a role a lesser citizens of the modern world. The current attitude of women that they can do what the hell they want, to whom and whenever the fuck they like does not bode well for a healthy society. Right now, there are eight children in Queensland whom if they could, would no doubt agree.

Women’s Biggest Problem Isn’t Misogyny – It’s Apathy

If you partake in any conversation with women (and I don’t know why you would) on the subject of gender equality and men’s rights, inevitably said women will throw up accusations of misogyny. What the fuck standing up for the rights of men has to do with misogyny, I’ll never know and probably never care. The reality is that most women having no idea what the fuck misogyny even means will never stop them from inserting the word into any conversation they can. Then again, what do you expect from members of the weaker sex?

I don’t deny that misogyny exists. I have seen a fair number of truly misogynistic men in my time (nothing compared to the number of truly misandric females that have crossed my path) but fortunately these men are so few in number that they don’t present a problem to the female populace at large. Despite all the feminist rhetoric, I feel very confident that misogyny is an attitude held by a relatively small percentage of the overall male gender.

The bigger problem for women is men who are apathetic towards gender relations. Commonly these are men who have joined the MGTOW or PUA lifestyles. None of the men in either of these groups really gives a fuck about women and their problems and if women were smart they would recognise this for the problem it is. Men who don’t give a rat’s ass about women are men who will ignore a woman being assaulted (even if she brought the beating on herself), who will not donate a penny to women’s causes such as breast and cervical cancer research (much like how most women will not donate to prostate and testicular cancer research), who will not treat women with any respect whatsoever (much like how most women treat most men) and so on. Unlike misogynistic men who are few in numbers, men whom are apathetic to women seem to be increasing by the month. At the rate we are going, one has to wonder when women and their rights will be viewed as irrelevant by the majority of men in society. Given that female equality depends on male permission (let’s face it – if men hadn’t have allowed women to leave their kitchens, they would still be there) it is quite possible that society will revert back to being essentially a patriarchy. However, unlike the benevolent patriarchy of the past in which men had reason to care for and respect women, the new patriarchy as run by apathetic men will likely be one in which women are viewed as inferior and unworthy of male care or consideration.

I can see this happening in the future. When it does, women will have no-one to blame but themselves.

The Only “Yes” is a Yes. Anything Else is a No

If there is one thing I have learned about women it is that pretty much everything they say is horseshit. This especially applies to “Yes” and “No”. The crowd over at ROK have a nice article on this up at the moment….

http://www.returnofkings.com/49782/maybe

That sums it up in a nutshell; unless you get a “yes” from a woman (and even then), the answer is no. The moral of the story is don’t let women fuck you around with bullshit like “Maybe” and “We’ll see”. If you don’t get a clear yes, it aint gonna happen. The only option is to next her and move on.

“The Sexodus” – Breitbart: A look at Social Decline from a Male POV

The decline of the world and civilisation as a function of the decline of the role of men in the world has been an ongoing disaster since the feminists were given power in society. No article points out the problem better than this article. However, unlike most other articles/posts on the subject, the linked post looks at the issue from an exclusively male perspective. The following quote pretty much sums up the mindset of so many modern men…….

Social commentators, journalists, academics, scientists and young men themselves have all spotted the trend: among men of about 15 to 30 years old, ever-increasing numbers are checking out of society altogether, giving up on women, sex and relationships and retreating into pornography, sexual fetishes, chemical addictions, video games and, in some cases, boorish lad culture, all of which insulate them from a hostile, debilitating social environment created, some argue, by the modern feminist movement. 

You can hardly blame them. Cruelly derided as man-children and crybabies for objecting to absurdly unfair conditions in college, bars, clubs and beyond, men are damned if they do and damned if they don’t: ridiculed as basement-dwellers for avoiding aggressive, demanding women with unrealistic expectations, or called rapists and misogynists merely for expressing sexual interest.”

As a general rule, if you want someone to simply give up competing in a given environment, then putting them in a no-win situation is the best way to go about it. Once upon a time, men had a realistic set of expectations placed in front of them to be considered respectable. Modern men can hardly be blamed for not bothering with women and social conventions in general if the practical reality is that, no matter what they do, the game is rigged so they can’t come out ahead. I doesn’t help when the basic rules of sexual conduct are set by women – and arbitrarily at that – and these rules are never explained to men…….

The new rules men are expected to live by are never clearly explained, says Rivlin, leaving boys clueless and neurotic about interacting with girls. “That might sound like a good thing because it encourages men to take the unromantic but practical approach of asking women how they should behave, but it causes a lot of them to just opt out of the game and retreat to the sanctuary of their groups of lads, where being rude to women gets you approval, and you can pretty much entirely avoid one-on-one socialising with the opposite sex.”

The last part about men preferring to act like lads (and cads) and treat women poorly is an important one. We live in a society whereby men are increasingly treating women with less and less respect and courtesy. Now you know why. Women, on the other hand, constantly bemoan the lack of civility and respect they get from modern men and can’t understand where it comes from. If women want a return to the days of civility and chivalry from men then they would do well to work out what the hell it is they want and let men know what it is. As a rule, we men like to understand the rules of whatever environment we happen to be in so that we can work out just what the fuck we are supposed to be doing. The current status of relations between the sexes – as defined by women – completely does away with this and women still can’t work out what has gone wrong. Of course, all this has a hugely detrimental affect on sexual relations, mainly with younger men (and boys) not being able to be comfortable with the process of even learning how to relate to girls/women……..

There are also a lot of blokes who ignore women because they are scared and don’t know how to act. It goes without saying that boys who never spend any time alone with women are not very good at relationships.”

and

The result? “A lot of nice but awkward young men are opting out of approaching women because there is no opportunity for them to make mistakes without suffering worse embarrassment than ever.”

That last quote is important as it signifies a major shift in the relations between the sexes. In past generations, a man who lacked in confidence with women but was other wise respectable, was pardoned by women for his lack of sexual confidence (up to a point) because he was respectable. In other words, in years past, a man’s machismo wasn’t the be all, end all of his attractiveness and women were insightful enough (or intelligent enough) to realise this. Ultimately, this enabled a lot of good men to get married, enjoy relationships/sex and raise children. Sadly, those days have passed. In the modern era, a man’s machismo counts for pretty much 100% of his sexual value in the eyes of women. That is, even if he is otherwise useless, a man who exudes sexual confidence will have no trouble attracting women. On the other hand, the world is full of perpetually single men who, whilst perfectly functional and respectable to the rest of society, are deemed to be unworthy by women because they don’t act like testosterone over-loaded savages. The ironic thing is that the only way to become confident at anything is to try, fail, learn from failure and try again without being punished for failing. Modern women are only too happy to humiliate an unsuccessful suitor by embarrassing him in front of others or by labelling him a creep. Is it any wonder that increasing numbers of men are seeing avoiding approaching women as a lesser evil than trying to keep up in an environment where the deck is stacked against them and the rules contradict each other?

“Men say the gap between what women say and what they do has never been wider. Men are constantly told they should be delicate, sensitive fellow travellers on the feminist path. But the same women who say they want a nice, unthreatening boyfriend go home and swoon over simple-minded, giant-chested, testosterone-saturated hunks in Game of Thrones. Men know this, and, for some, this giant inconsistency makes the whole game look too much like hard work. Why bother trying to work out what a woman wants, when you can play sports, masturbate or just play video games from the comfort of your bedroom?”

Why indeed? The contradiction between what women say they want and what they actually want has never been greater. Men are creatures of pragmatics; we do what we see works. If being kind and chivalrous truly attracted women them men would be lining up to join charm schools. As it is, men by the millions pay good money for pick-up guides which are little more than instruction manual in how to treat women like shit. Why is this? Because treating women poorly gets a man more sexual attention from women than treating a woman like a lady. The fact that a sleazy, tattooed drug dealer who peddles crack to kids gets infinitely more sexual attention than a mild mannered, accountant in proof of that. Yet, when confronted with this contradiction, most women deny it to their dying breath. Why indeed do men even bother?

The fact that women are quite happy to keep a misandric society in place is probably never going to convince men to become re-involved, either…….

One professional researcher in his late thirties, about whom I have been conversing on this topic for some months, puts it spicily: “For the past, at least, 25 years, I’ve been told to do more and more to keep a woman. But nobody’s told me what they’re doing to keep me.

“I can tell you as a heterosexual married male in management, who didn’t drop out of society, the message from the chicks is: ‘It’s not just preferable that you should fuck off, but imperative. You must pay for everything and make everything work; but you yourself and your preferences and needs can fuck off and die.”

That sums up modern women for you; all they want is a man’s resources. The man himself is irrelevant. In a very real sense, this confirms the concept of women as gold diggers. In times past, men merely suspected that some women were out to marry their wallets; quotes like the one above are proof of it. Keep in mind that modern women don’t even have to marry to be gold diggers, the gynocentric state has taken care of that for them. Given that men pay the majority of taxes, you would think it would make sense that a proportional amount of the taxpayer dollar was spent on men’s issues. But no – quite the opposite; far more is spent on women’s issues than men’s issues. If you think women are likely to protest this anomaly in the near future you are dreaming. If anything, the zero-sum mentality of women causes them to see and possible gain for men as a loss to women. With this is mind, women will do all they can to keep the guvment from spending money on men so said guvment has more money to spend on women. Deep down, most men know this and they know that the overwhelming majority of women don’t really care about them. If you don’t believe that, try getting a woman to donate towards prostate or testicular cancer research; it’s easier to get blood out of a stone. Men, on the other hand, will happily donate towards breast and cervical cancer research. Such is life. Why would men even consider having anything to do with the other half of humanity that has no regard for them?

We can also talk about the huge impact feminism has had on male education, employment and general rights of living (hint: it hasn’t been good). There are quite a few mentions of that in the linked article and the section mentioning Jack Donovan is quite insightful. I recommend anyone who needs waking up to the realities of men read this article. If you are a man who is just coming aware there is something drastically wrong with the world today, I definitely recommend this article.

Anyway you look at it, there is something badly wrong with the world and the average man on the street didn’t cause it.

But Women Judge Men’s Appearance….

If I had five cents for every time I have heard/read/seen anything along the lines of a woman’s appearance being no-one’s business but her own, I’d be rich beyond my wildest dreams. If I had the same five cents for every time I have heard/read/seen anything along the lines of a man’s appearance being no-one’s business but his own, I’d still be broke. Apart from the obvious hypocrisy, why does this contradiction exist? Actually, it’s only because of the hypocrisy and let’s face it, since when hasn’t the entire feminist movement been based on hypocrisy?

The following post illustrates this quite clearly…..

Hypocrisy in Action

The man in the first scenario is obviously Matt Taylor, the fucking genius who landed a spacecraft on a comet (and I can’t even begin to think of the pure genius behind that) who had the misfortune to wear a shirt that many feminists chose to be offended over. As one might expect, said feminists and miscellaneous SJW’s has no issue with making with Mr Taylor’s appearance.

In the second example, a typical clueless female who wears an obviously inappropriate shirt not only has her rights to be inappropriate enforced but is able to punish a superior who rightly reprimanded her. If this isn’t an example of different rules for men and women, I don’t know what is.

I call on all men to do what I do, every time you hear a woman comment on a man’s appearance, give her a dose of her own medicine. If there is one way guaranteed to upset a modern woman, it’s throwing her own shit back in her face.

But of Course, Women are Never Violent

Have a look at the following vid from India……

Indian Bitches Beating Man

and tell me again that women are never violent and never provoke men into violence against them. Also tell me that men’s first response to female aggression is to slap a woman around. Looking at the vid, you certainly can’t come to either conclusion. This vid basically shows two Indian cunts assaulting a man who does not appear to be causing any harm to them. Apparently the excuse is that the man was allegedly (and I’ll emphasise allegedly) “verbally harassing” then. So what? If a woman “verbally harasses” me, I don’t have the right to assault her; what gives women the idea they can smack a man around for “verbally harassing” them (apart from the obvious entitlement complex that pretty much all women have nowadays)?

If nothing else, this vid shows two things: a) women are just as capable (and probably just as likely) to abuse men as men are to abuse women and b) given the man made no attempt to retaliate – he actually fled the scene – men handle conflict and aggression a lot better than women.

This is one vid to show any mangina and white knights you know to prove that gendered violence is often not initiated by men.

Clementine Ford – Just Another Paranoid Feminist Idiot

I just caught the following load of crap from Clementine Ford….

Clementine Ford Capture

For those who don’t know, Ford is an Australian freelance journalist who writes for any left-wing rag that will have her. The reason she is freelance is obviously because she is nowhere near good enough to land a permanent gig. As you can tell from the “article” above, Ford is a foaming-at-the-mouth feminist. The sheer misandry and sense of entitlement in her rant is typical of the shit she writes. How fucking paranoid can you get? Ford feels “vulnerable and unsafe” because a man tried to shake her hand? Please fuck off. That’s how men greet one another and aren’t feminists the ones who are always saying they wanted to be treated the same as men? Obviously they only wanted to be treated like men when it suits them. The rest of the time – which men are supposed to somehow psychically detect – feminists want to be treated like women (or special fucking princesses in the case of most of them).

Contrary to what Ford thinks, men do not need to modify their otherwise harmless behaviours just to make women feel safe. It is not the fault of men that feminists like Ford are cowards. If Ford and her feminist mates expects to be able to cope in the world of men, they need to grow a fucking spine. After all that’s the biggest difference between men and most modern women.

This is a Typical Feminist Attitude Towards Men and Male Issues

Take a look at this opinion piece by Susie O’Brien in today’s Herald Sun.…….

Of particular note is the last paragraph which I will copy below…….

He’s missing the point to ask why hasn’t feminism done any thing for men? Why should it? For instance, in general, men don’t live as long because they drink more, don’t eat well and don’t look after their health. You can’t blame feminism for what men do to themselves. Being pro-women doesn’t make you anti-men. Men aren’t dirty rotten scoundrels, but neither are feminists.”

I think this sums up the attitude most feminazis have towards men; that men should do everything for women (such as support White Ribbon, donate to breast and cervical cancer causes, tolerate all men being blamed for domestic violence/rape as well as putting up with women’s sense of entitlement in life in general), however, men should not expect anything from women. If you wanted an example of how solipsistic modern women tend to be, the above quote covers it nicely. It amazes me that huge numbers of blue-pill men simply cannot see the truth for what it is. So many of these guys go around saying how wonderful women are and how badly we men treat them (despite all evidence to the contrary) whilst ignoring all the neglect/abuse men put up with from women.

Personally, I don’t support White Ribbon, donate to women-only charities, tolerate men-are-abusers attitudes or display any form of chivalry whatsoever. I learned the hard way the feminazis (like O’Brien) don’t give a flying fuck about issues to do with men yet still expect men to care more about issues to do with women than issues that effect men. My response to that kind of hypocrisy is “Fuck that”. I care that men commit suicide at four times the rate of women (probably higher if you consider that female suicide attempts are almost always cries for attention). I care that men have shorter life expectancies than women and not because of the bullshit reasons listed by O’Brien, either but because men are vastly more likely to die in the workplace, men are more likely to die in wars, men are more genetically disposed to heart disease and because precious little of the health budget is spent on male-specific causes of death. I care that men face injustice in divorce courts which routinely fleece men to fund the adulterous lifestyles of unfaithful wives. I care that millions of divorced men have children they never get to see. The list goes on. Although O’Brien pays lip service to some of the problems facing men (and that’s all it is, lip service), her attitude is obviously one of condescension. This was merely an introduction to another one of her anti-male diatribes.

With the above in mind, it is clear that no sane man in the modern era should give a shit about women – especially when her “issues” conflict with the more genuine concerns of men. Women have said over and over they don’t care about men. It is high time men stopped caring about women.

Tit for Tat

I just found the following Tinder screen grab from reddit/mensrants…….

Tinder Grab

This a great example of Black Knighting at work. Most women refuse to date men who do not meet whatever nebulous criteria women have for men yet get offended when a man has standards for women. In the above grab, the well-worn tendency for women to prefer only tall men (and 6’3″ is well above average height) is revealed. Not only that, but the women in question asks for this information with no hesitation. However, when the man wants to know the woman’s weight (ie is she fat and if so, how fat), the women demands to know why the man wants to know this. Obviously, the woman (like most women) dos not feel a man has any right to ask any information of her that she might be sensitive about. Given that the woman replied by asking why does her weight matter instead of answering the question, I am willing to bet she is fat. in such as case, the woman should be grateful that a man pays her any attention at all instead of looking the proverbial gift horse in the mouth.

The above is an example of two basic issues when dealing with women……

a) women are hypocrites – they always want one set of rules for us and another set of rules for them.

b) Black Knighting is a good way to put a woman on the back foot and take control of interactions with them.

Always seek to control your interactions with women. Women are designed to be subservient to men, not the other way around.

WIIFM?

The above stands for “What’s In It For Me?” and this should be asked be each and every man when considering donating his time/money/whatever to a woman. In truth, this questions be asked by every man looking to get involved in anything but unlike most other things in the world, women have the annoying habit of devouring a man’s resources whilst offering absolutely nothing in return. This is discussed in this post from ROK.

Women love to have an assortment of beta blue-pill orbiters on tap to do shit like move their furniture, fix broken shit, offer a shoulder to cry on when their bad-boy abusive boyfriend dumps them, send annoying shit to on social media, borrow money from and a whole host of other parasitical behaviours not worth mentioning. The sad thing is that not only do women feel it is perfectly acceptable to treat man like this wherever possible (it isn’t acceptable to treat anyone like this as this is called using people), but many men who don’t know better simply go along with it for want of knowing any better. I should know – I used to be one of these guys. In my distant past blue-pill days, I was the guy who was all of the above and more to women including that I wasn’t the guy that women went to bed with. The guys women did go to bed with were the ones who did none of the above and still got laid. In short, I allowed women to waste my resources for no personal gain on my behalf whist the guys that actually benefitted from having anything to do with these women were the ones who invested almost none of their resources in them. Looking back, I am amazed the Red-Pill didn’t land on me a lot earlier.

The essential problem I had back in the day – and many men still have – is that when dealing with a woman, I was prepared to accept and unacceptable outcome. Between a man and a woman, there are four possible outcomes……..

a) she wants nothing to you.

b) you want nothing to do with her.

c) you initiate an interaction that may lead to having sex with her.

d) she just wants to be friends.

Option a), well – shit happens. Too bad. Option b), it does happen that once you begin to actually talk to a particular woman, you discover why she was alone in the first place – again, shit happens. Option c) assuming you and she don’t find each other repellent in the fist place, c) is the desired outcome and is the only acceptable outcome from here. Let’s face it, sex is just about the only thing that makes women worthwhile. If it weren’t for that, why would men talk to them?

Option d) is the bogey. The good old let’s-just-be-friends is the line women just love to pull out to string men alone and leads to them becoming a major drain on your life. It is also an unacceptable option for any self-actualised man. The only acceptable response to the LJBF is along the lines of, “Sorry but that’s not what I am looking for. Have a nice life” and leave. Not only does this take away control of the interaction from the woman, it also states to the said woman that as man, you have greater self value than to act as another orbiting supplicant.

Essentially, by asking WIIFM in the above scenario, a man is able to eliminate from his life women who will contribute nothing to his life, thus freeing him up to pursue women who will contribute to his life.

In taking the above approach to interactions with women, no doubt many women will accuse you of being selfish or just wanting them for sex. You should agree with them on both counts. The definition of selfish is to put one’s own needs ahead of others and any man who wants to be in charge of his life does exactly that. Additionally, of course you only want women for sex; you are a man after all. You don’t want a woman for a friend; that’s what other men are for. No that women have anything to offer as friends anyway. By using women purely for sex, you are allowing them to fulfil their purpose in nature; what could be wrong with that?

Essentially, WIIFM is an attitude that allows a man to put his priorities first and live life according to his standards. Life is finite; why waste it catering to the whims of parasitical people (read women) when you could be out satisfying your own desires.