I’m not talking about double-penetrations either in case you have a dirty mind.
Have a look at the following link to reddit/mensrights…..
Essentially, because a couple of airhead females don’t feel comfortable using the weights area at their gym while there are men present, they expect the gym to take action to male them happy. To make matters worse, the gym management is considering having female-only hours to cater for these sort of bimbos. I have a problem with this whole situation on a number of levels….
a) the gym is obviously co-ed. The women would have known that when they joined up. If they had a problem with men being in the gym at the same time as them, why the fuck did they join a co-ed gym.
b) following on from the above point, the women could have Just as easily joined a female-only gym (such as curves). If they had of done that, problem solved as there would have been no problem in the first place.
c) men don’t have any option but to use co-ed gyms. Male-only establishments of any variety are barred by law. This being the case, the only option for men is not to go to the gym in the first place.
d) should the gym introduce female-only hours – effectively reducing the privileges that male members pay for – will they reduce the membership fees for males? I strongly fucking doubt it.
e) related to the above point, should the gym introduce female-only hours, will these hours be at the convenience of men or women? For example, at the gym I go to, the most popular times are between 5:30pm and 7:30pm weekdays. Assuming the same applies to the gym in question, will the female-only hours be booked to avoid this or will the men be expected to change their gym timetables to accommodate the whim of women?
f) will there be any democratic process involved. If there are a large number of women with the same complaint and only a few men who use the weights room (bloody unlikely given experience and the description in the link), there might be a case. However, if there is a large number of men who stand to be inconvenienced to appease the whims of a pair of women then the whole issue should die there and then.
The management of the gym needs to take a good hard look at the whole situation before they make any decisions they later regret. A local gym that I used to belong to make a similar decision to effectively discriminate against its male members in the hope of appeasing a small female minority. The end result was a loss of male members who happily moved to other gyms throughout the region whose management was smart enough not to discriminate against the majority of their memberships. To make matters worse for the offending gym in my area, the loss of male members (which was pretty fucking substantial) was in no way compensated by an increase in new female members. Logically, prospective female members preferred to either go to a fully female-only gym if they were that way inclined or they preferred to be in a co-ed environment. Basically, this proved to be a complete loss for the gym in question all around. I have heard that the female-only hours policy has since been reversed but I couldn’t give two shits; I am happy at the gym I relocated to and have no intention of going back.
The moral of the story is that being female friendly is one thing but being antagonistic towards males is another. Every decision we make in life has consequences.