Student Loans are a Good Idea

I know a lot of people will probably shit their pants reading the title but hear me out. Back before my day in of education – think Australia late 80’s early 90’s – tertiary education was free. Whilst that sounds good and well, the reality was that numerous university placements were taken up by people who had no interest in actually ever working but rather just wanted something to do all day. You probably know whom I am talking about here and yes, I am going to pick on women again. In the old days of tertiary education in Australia, it was common for bored housewives to enlist in whatever bullshit courses their inferior mentality could handle and hand out for as long as they felt like it. Of course, as soon as the said mentioned bored housewives found it too hard, they dropped out. That was no loss to them as they were never intending to work anyway. The problem with this was twofold: firstly, every housewife that got into university kept a more deserving person out and secondly, it was a complete waste of money.

Of course the other problem was that women had – and still do, to a large degree – a tendency to study courses that had no chance of ever leading to employment and thus offering the taxpayer a return on investment. Let’s face it, few women ever go to university to become brain surgeons; most of them would rather study useless shit like humanities and arts. Back in the day of free education, this was all good and well as no one ever had to think about the actual value of the education they were receiving.

In the second (or was is the third?) year of my tertiary education, the federal government of the day brought in the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS for short). Under HECS, for every tear a student studied a given course, they accumulated a debt that had to be paid. The part that was fairest – that many women objected to the most – was that students who did not complete their studies still acquired a debt. All of a sudden, education in Australia was no longer the free for all it had been as people studying had to think about why they were actually going to university in the first place. Now, for men, this was not a problem as men have always been expected to think about what the fuck we are doing and take responsibility for it in the future. We just got on with our studies as usual. Not so the women – Jesus, did they raise a fucking stink. How dare the government put an onus on them for the taxpayer dollars they were spending. How dare the government actually expect women to enter a course of study that might actually lead to them being productive members of society. The list goes on. This was the basic strength of HECS – it dramatically reduced the vast numbers of students studying useless shit and then dropping out halfway through or whenever they felt like it. Gentle hint – I’m talking about women here.

OK, I agree that student debt is a pain in the ass when you are acquiring it and paying it off, but in Australia, it has made the education that much stronger. I am willing it does the same in your country too.

This is a Good (if a little extreme) Example of What is Wrong with Modern Women

Take a look at this article and once again wonder why the men of today have so little regard for women.

As much as women deny it, we all know that women get their cunts moist for men whom are the worst society has to offer. Women will deny this to their dying days but the proof is everywhere you choose to look. The idiot woman in the article, Jill Curry, is a great example of that. No only did she seel to have sex (and repeatedly, at that) with a convicted felon, she choose to do so in the same prison she was employed. Not only does this undermine the entire security protocols of the prison, it puts everyone else in the prison at risk. There is a good fucking reason why prisons keep convicts locked up – most of them are fucking dangerous. How smart is it for a silly bitch like curry to go around releasing her incarcerated fuck-buddy for regular quickies? Fuck me dead but some women are stupid. This kind of female clusterfuckery reminds me of a similar incident I posted about a couple of years ago.

Apart from the obvious fact that no woman can be trusted with any responsibility, there is another lesson once can learn from watching Jill Curry. Notice upon her conviction, she bursts into tears and declares how sorry she is?

‘”I exposed you guys to danger that I didn’t even think about,” the 38-year-old told a group of sheriff’s deputies.’

and

“I feel nothing but regret and sadness, and I’m so sorry.”

The last part is true but the first part is horseshit and anyone who knows women will attest to it. Curry is no doubt full of regret and sorry but this has nothing to do with her dereliction of duty and endangering the sheriff’s deputies. Rather, Curry is only regretful because she got caught. Had she not been caught, she would still be taking dick from the felon. This is a common thread amongst women; women regret that they get caught out doing the wrong thing but they rarely experience true remorse. Ask any man who busts his wife for cheating. Without fail, the waterworks turn on and the wifey promises never to do it again. And they don’t – at least not again the same night. Once wifey has her beta hubby chumped up again, she will be out taking strange dick again like nothing ever happened. This largely explains why so many women cheat and continue to do so even after being caught out at it. If more men knew this and viewed women accordingly, the world would be a much better accordingly.

Why are So Many Young, White Males Going Overseas to Fight for ISIS?

You’d have to think that if any of Australia’s young males were going to leave our shores to fight for Islamic State, it would be the children of parents who came from there. This does happen but the more surprising thing is the number of young white males whom convert to Islam and then go to Syria to commit atrocities against the enemies of Islam. Given that Muslims seem to hate just about everyone else on Earth, they have no shortage of potential targets for young white guys to fuck up. Case in point, consider Jake Bilardi. By all reports, Bilardi was a straight A student whose life fell apart after his mother – to whom Bilardi was close – died. By itself, this should not be enough to drive someone to betray his nation and society but consider the society that Bilardi and other such young men live in; modern society places little value on males in general and on young males in particular. From an early age, boys are indoctrinated to hate their own gender by misandrists feminist teachers who routinely value girls ahead of boys. Higher education opportunities are biased towards girls via quota systems designed to keep higher education out of the reach of males. Employment is becoming harder for men to find as employers are expected to favour female applicants even when they are clearly not the best person for the positions vacant. Although very intelligent, Jake Bilardi was very skinny and physically weak. Modern society places much greater value on male physical prowess than intellectual abilities and effectively marginalises less physically able boys and men. No such societal displacement exists for less able/desirable women as women are taught that all females are special. Young males see their gender slandered in the media and all forms of entertainment whilst the many failings of women are never allowed to be mentioned. The list goes on but after eighteen years of this, it is not too hard to see why Jake Bilardi had probably had enough and said fuck it. The one thing I have to say about middle-eastern cultures is that at least men are valued and respected. Given that value and respect are two things afforded to all women in modern society but only granted to men of they can earn it, it is not too hard to imagine the lure of ISIS to a shy, nerdy and otherwise socially-disenfranchised young male like Jake Bilardi. The sad thing is that this is a disaster of our own devising. Where do you think all the misandry that imbalanced the impressionable young mind of Jake Bilardi came from? It came from the same philosophy that has made society at large a hostile place for males; that philosophy is feminism. Why else do you think the modern world is full of angry young men? All these fired-up young dudes have had a whole lifetime of being made to feel not good enough (as opposed to their female cohorts whom are treated like princesses). Until we reinstate basic recognition of respect for males in society (the same as we have for females), nothing is going to change. The next time someone complains about young men fighting against Australia or the angry young men down the street, tell them to lay the blame squarely at the feet of the nearest feminist. They’re the ones who started all this shit.

Ronda Rousey is a Coward

There has been a lot said recently by female MMA fighter, Ronda Rousey since she defeated Cat Zingano recently. Whilst Rousey did defeat Zingano in 14 seconds, this says more about the lack of depth in female sports in general than it does about Rousey’s ability. Similarly, Rousey was going on about how she thinks she will be the only female fighter to retire undefeated – all this after only ten or eleven fights. Sweetheart, you need to make it to twenty-five or thirty fights undefeated before you start making claims like that. Alternately, Rousey could retire undefeated after 11 or 12 fights but that’s not really the same thing; at least, that’s how men do it.

What really annoyed me – and probably a lot of other people as well – was after her fight with Zingano when Rousey claimed…….

‘”I would have to say if you’re just talking about what’s in the realm of possibility of what’s possible of who I could beat, well I could beat 100 percent of them“‘

Rousey was talking about men in her own weight division. Personally, I think that is about as likely as a mouse eating a cat – a whole, live cat. But we are never going to find out because in the next breath, Rousey stated…….

‘”I really just don’t think that any athletic commission on Earth would ever condone something like that,” Rousey said. “Fights are going to go both ways. You’re going to see both people hitting each other. I don’t think we should celebrate a man hitting a woman in any kind of setting.”‘

So basically, Rousey thinks it is OK to make a grandiose statement that she is as good (if not better) than a male fighter her own weight – which is horseshit – but then hide behind the “men-shouldn’t-hit-women” argument so she hasn’t got to put her money where her mouth is. I got news for you, Ronda; you’re a fucking coward. If you aren’t prepared to prove your mettle against a male fighter, then stop claiming they are only as good as you. You wouldn’t ever fight a man because you know he would mop the floor with your ass. That being the case, show male fighters the respect the respect they have earned and deserve.

Male College Students in the USA are Fucked Before They Even Start

I watched this vid regarding the saga of Joshua Strange yesterday. For those of you who don’t know, Joshua was a student at a prominent US college who was expelled on the mere allegation of rape by a female student. This happened after Joshua was found not guilty of any wrongdoing by the US legal system (ie nothing happened) but that didn’t stop the college from not only fucking up this young man’s future, but also leaving him with a permanent record of having been accused (not convicted or even prosecuted, mind you) of rape. Ignoring the fact that Joshua’s unjust expulsion has diminished his future employment options of itself, the fact he was expelled from a college on a rape allegation will follow him around for any and every job he ever applies for. If colleges in the US applied the same standard of evidence as the US legal system (which is clear and convincing evidence needed for conviction), there is no way Joshua could have possible been expelled from College. Sadly, this is not the case; colleges in the US apply the preponderance of standard of “evidence” which mandates that if there is even a 51% chance the accusation could be true, the allegation must be upheld. Given that at Joshua’s college inquisition trial, he was not allowed to make a statement in his own defence, was not allowed to be represented by a lawyer and was not allowed to question his accuser, achieving a 51% standard of “evidence” would not have been too hard. If anything, Joshua would have had little or no chance of proving his fairly obvious innocence.

With shit like this going on in the USA, is it any wonder that less and less men are going to college nowadays? If less and less men are graduating as the leaders of American society, where does that leave the USA in the future. The obvious conclusion is not very well. Men have traditionally been the leader of society because women are ill-suited for such roles. Given the current state of affairs – which shows no sign of slowing down – it won’t be long before the USA becomes a nation bereft of leadership and then what?

It is all fine and well for feminists to claim bullshit like, “He obviously did it” or “This is just an isolated case” but neither are true. The US legal system found Joshua had no case to answer and Joshua is hardly an isolated case. This kind of ill-treatment plays out every day of the week on college campuses in the USA affecting God alone knows how many male students (and pretty much only male students). This has to stop. Yes – rape is a crime and must be punished. However, as Joshua’s mother pointed out in the vid, this is not the brief of college student unions or administration who would be better to channel their energies into better facilities for students and other such matters. Issues involving matter of legal accusations are best left to the legal system whom are best able to administer such issues. The proof of this – as in Joshua’s case – is that a student can be found guilty of an accusation of sexual impropriety after he has been found innocent of the same accusation by the legal system.

Is it any wonder the young men of America are increasingly distrusting of both society and women? Not to me, and with good reason, too.

Do Men Subsidise Women’s Wages?

I was at a state-wide meeting for work on Monday. At the meeting were the actual workers – ie the people who actually add value and bring in the money – these were by a sizable majority male. The few female “workers” who were there were nearly all part-time employed (at their request, of course). What really stood out was the numbers of women at the meeting whom were middle or upper-level managers of one description or another. In fact, now that I think of it, apart from the Managing Director (whom is a man), every other “management” person there was a woman. From memory, the female managers included two state managers, the HR manager, the national clinic manager and the retail manager. During the meeting, all members of management gave presentations as to what was happening in their department. As you might have expected, the only manager to have anything worth listening to was the male Managing Director; all of the female managers gave presentations that were either complete fluff and comprehensive examples of why women should not be in management. So why are these women employed to jobs for which they are ill-suited? I have no idea either but I am willing to bet political correctness has a lot to do with it. The point is that all of these female “managers” would be soaking up hefty salaries without giving much back in return. Why companies put up with this from women is beyond me; male employees who seek to soak up decent salaries without giving a worthwhile return soon find themselves unemployed. And where, do you ask, does the money come from to pay these useless female managers? Obviously it comes from the workers at the coal face (whom are mainly men). Judging by where I work, men do indeed subsidise women’s wages.

Finally – A Family Court Judge with Common Sense and Fairness

For far too long, women have used his fault divorce no fault divorce to not only fleece their husbands of assets but to continue to earn a living off their former spouses even well after the marriage ended. For a woman who leaves a perfectly good marriage to a man who has treated her well (which is the case in most divorces) to have the right to at least half his assets is deplorable. For a woman to be able to collect an ongoing income from her ex-husband in the form of alimony is nothing short of cruel and inhuman. The apparent justification for alimony has been the wife is entitled to maintain the lifestyle she has become accustomed to. Says fucking who? The wife’s entitlement to the “lifestyle she has become accustomed to” should end at the same time as the marriage. If I work for a company who pay me a wage that allows me to maintain a certain quality of life, then my entitlement to said wage and quality of life is contingent on me being part of that company. Should I leave the company (either voluntarily or not), my entitlements from that company end immediately. It is then up to me to make do for myself in the future as the company has no other obligations towards me. This makes sense to most people yet for some reason, women seem to feel that their ex-husbands are obligated to take care of them forever.

It seems that long-overdue change may finally be on the horizon. Take a look at the following link……

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11429864/Divorced-wife-told-to-get-a-job-and-stop-living-off-her-ex.html

About fucking time, too. The silly bitch in this story got an outrageous settlement and then has the temerity to expect the ex-hubby to support her for the rest of her life. The judge saw it quite differently…..

‘”The world of work has innumerable possibilities these day…vast numbers of women with children just get on with it and Mrs Wright should have done as well,” the judge said. ‘

and

‘The judge criticised her for being “evasive on the subject of her own earning capacity“. ‘

In other words, the judge agreed – in this case at least – that alimony is a racket and the ex-husband is being abused as a result.

‘Mrs Wright has made no effort whatsoever to seek work or to update her skills…I am satisfied that she has worked on the basis…that she would be supported for life.

‘”It is essential… that she starts to work now,” said the judge’

Not only that, but the judge did not accept any of the whiny excuses the ex-wife put up for not making any effort to support herself…….

‘”Judge Roberts did not accept any of the explanations put forward by the wife for her inactivity and ruled that it was important that she obey the order.

“She had harsh words for the wife for her complete failure to confront her obligation to contribute financially. She found the wife exaggerated her income needs.’

As one might expect, when the ex-husband presents as an honest person and the ex-wife does not, the Judge is not going to be too kind to the ex-wife…….

‘Mr Wright had been found to be “a man of integrity who had done nothing to mislead the court”.

“But the judge found the wife was an unsatisfactory witness; particularly on the subject of her own earning capacity she was evasive”, he added’

Put simply, the wife either misled or outright lied during the initial settlement for her own gain. One wonders whether there might be legal proceedings against her in the future. Perhaps the ex-husband could sue her for obtaining assets from him under false pretences? Either way, one quote near the end of the article is telling…..

‘Lord Justice Pitchford said that “the order was never intended to provide the wife with an income for life“.’

Now that is interesting. If we must have alimony – and it should be avoided as a last option – it should be limited to a realistic time period. A man whose marriage falls apart should not have to support his wife forever. We live in an era where women face no barriers to finding work. One could even argue that with family friendly and affirmative action policies in place, women find it more easy than men to find work.

I never thought I would see the day when common sense and decency would take place in the family court but here it is. I can only hope this becomes a precedent and more and more men seek to reverse unfair divorce settlement and alimony rulings.

 Perhaps there is a light at the end of the tunnel after all.

 

Adria Richards has Fucked Herself Royally

I always wondered – albeit with a degree of malice – what ever happened to Adria Richards. In case you need your memory refreshed, Richards was the idiot tech-chick who made a big noise about a nothing comment from two men sitting in the row behind her. The comment made by the med was not about Richards and nor was it directed to Richards; in short Richards stuck her nose in where it wasn’t wanted and shamed the two men on Twitter. As a result of this, one of the men lost his job – only to be re-hired elsewhere shortly afterwards. The whole incident became known as ‘Donglegate’. At any rate, this does not answer the initial question; what happened to Adria Richards as a result of the Donglegate affair? It is well know that her employer at the time, SendGrid, fired Richards for the way she handled the whole matter. In the very words of SendGrid management……..

What we do not support was how she (Richards) reported the conduct. Her decision to tweet the comments and photographs of the people who made the comments crossed the line. Publicly shaming the offenders – and bystanders – was not the appropriate way to handle the situation.”

In other words, SendGrid were smart enough to know that a woman who could handle a simple solution so badly was a public relations time-bomb just waiting to go off. The thing you can never get through the heads of idiots like Richards is that no matter how brilliant you might be at your work (and I am not saying that Richards was), your employer is entitled to judge you on your personal attributes as they may impact on your work, your co-workers and the company at large. Keeping in mind that Richards job at SendGrid was “Developer Relations”, she obviously had no concept of how to do that. No wonder SendGrid booted her. In the second link above, Richards that not only has she not been able to find another job (big surprise) but her life is changed forever…….

The death threats and rape threats and racist insults continued even after she was fired“.

Richards should have thought of that before she tried to fuck up someone’s like for her own amusement. Personally, I would have thought this whole episode would have been a great opportunity for Richards to do a little introspection into how her actions and decisions influenced her outcomes. Sadly this sis not happen……..

Adria replied that she was happy to hear that Hank “wasn’t active in driving their interests to mount the raid attack”, but that she held him responsible for it anyway. It was “his own actions that resulted in his own firing, yet he framed it in a way to blame me… If I had a spouse and two kids to support, I certainly would not be telling ‘jokes’ like he was doing at a conference. Oh, but wait, I have compassion, empathy, morals and ethics to guide my daily life choices. I often wonder how people like Hank make it through life seemingly unaware of how ‘the other’ lives in the same world he does, but with countless fewer opportunities.”

Just where the fuck do I start with this one? Firstly, Richards claims Hank’s action resulted in her firing. Dead fucking wrong; Richards’ decision to shame the man online is what led to his firing. Had she had the good sense to simply turn around and tell the guys their behaviour was inappropriate, that would have been the end of it. Richards could have taken the photo of the two men to the conference organisers and let them take it from there. Ultimately, it was Richards’ nastiness that cost a (presumably talented) male developer his job.

Richards claims if she had a spouse and two kids, she would not be telling jokes at a conference. Firstly, it is unlikely that any man would ever want to marry and impregnate a total cunt like Richards so that scenario becomes academic. Aside from that, who doesn’t tell the odd joke and I don’t care what anyone says, the “dongle” joke was on the very low side of being offensive. Is it the fault of the world that Richards and seemingly innumerable cunts like her have no sense of humour?

Richards claims to have “compassion, empathy, morals and ethics to guide my daily life choices“. You’re fucking kidding, right? You can make a mountain out of a molehill for your own amusement and you have the gall to criticise someone else’s compassion, empathy, morals and ethics? Let it not be said that Adria Richards is capable of great insight because clearly she is not.

Looking back over the comments of both Hank and Richards, I am struck by how much empathy Hank has for Richards and how little empathy Richards has for Hank. Let that be a life lesson for any man dealing with women.

Ultimately, it is Adria Richards who has gotten the worst fucking from the actions of Adria Richards. Do I care? No fucking way; fuck the bitch. Whilst I hope no actual harm ever comes to Richards, I will be quite pleased is she remains perpetually unemployed and spends the rest of her life living in fear of reprisals from the Donglegate she initiated.

Once Again a Woman Proves That Women are Clueless About Men

As if the world needs any more convincing that when it comes to men, women are generally idiots, we have this article. You could be forgiven for thinking that will all the blogs, articles and post comments on the net, women would eventually get the idea through their fucking dense heads that the disaster that is the modern dating scene is not wholly the fault of men. But no, the dippy chick who wrote the article remains about as clueless as more women when it comes to the male gender (and sadly, that is very clueless). The whole article is one great misogynistic man-bashing exercise that aims to deflect all possible fault away from women for problems they have largely caused. Who said women weren’t solipsistic?

Ladies, it’s been said before, but I’ll say it again: They just don’t make ‘em like they used to.”

That certainly applies to women. In days of old, do you think women were hypergamous sluts who jumped from one bad-boy cock to another? Do you think in years gone by women were raised by single moms to have zero domestic skills, personality or any other redeeming values that made them completely unsuitable as wives? No fucking way they were. In my grandpa’s day, when a man sacrificed his singlehood to marry, the woman he married was raised from birth to be a blessing to his existence. By contrast, modern women are the stuff of nightmares. I agree with the author in this one; they certainly don’t make them like they used to.

There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks. There’s no taking off hats or courting through invitations. There are no smooth moves, no jackets to dinner. There are no flowers, no tables by candlelight. But, most importantly, there are no dates.”

That’s because all the above is the province of chivalry and chivalry is a level of courtesy men display towards ladies. Ignoring the fact that chivalry is benevolent sexism (and also the fact that modern women claim to oppose feminism), the fact that few women in the modern era are ladies pretty much makes chivalry obsolete. Let’s face it, feminism promised endless promiscuity for women and most women have taken to promiscuity like ducks to water. Did any of these sluts ever bother to think that no man is going to put any more effort into getting a chick to fuck than he has too? Apart from that, no man wants to be the loser that waits six months to bang the woman whom other guys have banged on the first date. The reason chivalry was the done thing in generations gone is that women were smart enough to set the price of sex very high; if a man didn’t do these courteous things, he had no hope of getting laid. Modern women set the price of sex so low that pretty much any guy with game can bang any chick without trying too hard. Think on that one, dizzy bitches.

You’re not going on any dates or being courted in any type of manner because, unfortunately, men these days are cowards.”

That is nothing short of female solipsism at its worst. If men are such cowards, why do men have no problem signing up (often voluntarily) to the military in times of war? By contrast, why have women always opposed conscription for females in times of war? Obviously women are the cowards. However, if calling men cowards is what makes women feel better about themselves then that is what they will do.

We’re dealing with a new breed of men here and it’s not the kind we grew up dreaming about.”

I agree. Men are no longer weak, supplicants just dying to keep women on the pedestals they build for themselves. Increasing numbers of men have taken the Red Pill and are laying their own path for themselves and women be damned. On one hand, we have the PUA who treat modern women with all the respect they deserve (none) and develop tactics to fuck-and-chuck as many of these modern, entitled sluts as they can. On the other hand, we have the MGTOW men who avoid women and troubles they bring like the plague and quietly chuckle as one more bitch slams into the wall. None of these men are what women truly want but just remember, feminism and the modern female killed the gentleman.

Because they (men) don’t know what they want, they end up chasing nothing. It’s the dilemma of the overcrowded buffet. There are too many options so they choose an empty plate… or something they don’t even like to begin with.”

Are you fucking serious? All men know what they want from a women; men want a woman who will make a good wife. The problem comes when men realise that women like that don’t exist anymore because feminism killed them off. Men have simply evolved to make the best out of bad options; it’s not like we necessarily like the status quo but we are stuck with it. There are certainly not “too many options” for men; it’s either one slutty bitch or the next one; how does that amount to “too many options”? Given the limited shitty options for men chasing women, men often do end up with “something the don’t even like to begin with”. Did men ask women to devolve into a subspecies barely worthy of male attention? No we fucking did not; women did that all by themselves. Don’t blame men for your own stupidity.

And of course, the authoress then brings out the big guns….

They’re scared of you“.

and

Men are shy, timid and scared sh*tless of any woman with half a brain“.

Oh, fuck you and the horse you rode in on. I thought that furphy had been demolished years ago. Men are not afraid of strong women; men love strong women. Prior to the feminist disaster, men were surrounded by strong women who raised families and kept households in order because that is what strong women do. Unfortunately, modern women have no idea what a strong women is; to them a woman is “strong” if she is bitchy, over-opinionated and aggressive. In reality, a woman whom is bitchy, over-opinionated and aggressive is not strong, she is merely bitchy, over-opinionated and aggressive. Not only that, but she will be a major turn-off for any man with even a shred of masculinity. Of course, the solipsism of the modern female will  not let her see this so she has to blame men for her own shortcomings.

In the society in which we live today, with Gigi Hadid and Miranda Kerr’s Instagrams readily accessible, women have got a lot to compete with. Fortunately, we’re competing with women these men will never have a shot with. Unfortunately, these men don’t seem to know this.”

Are you serious? Do you mean to say that you believe that men walk around thinking they have a shot with supermodels? How retarded are you (redundant question; you’re a woman – of course you’re retarded)? Most men spend most of their lives being rejected by average women who think they are God’s gift to men. How could they possible think they would have a chance with the likes of Miranda Kerr?

We can dream about Channing Tatum and Chris Pine all we want, but at least women are rational enough to understand that’s just not gonna happen. So we settle for the options we’ve been given and learn to work with what we have.”

Christ, that is fucking rich. The world is full of women whose dating site profile insist they only be contacted by good-looking, muscular men over six feet who earn six figure incomes. More commonly, these women have looks that would turn off a blind man apart from having nothing else to offer. All this and you think men are unrealistic? How lacking in insight is this dense cunt?

To add insult to the few dates you have yet to be asked on, men are also getting married less than ever before. According to a study by Pew Research Center, only 26 percent of Generation-Y is married.

Compared to the 48 percent of our parents at this age, there’s no denying that men just don’t have their sh*t together.”

Again, obviously it is men’s fault the poor dears can’t find a sucker man to marry. I’m not saying men are perfect, but you might want to have a look in your own backyard before you start pointing out the faults in everyone else’s.

In conclusion……

We’re dating less and thus, marrying less. And the downfall picks up speed with every failed attempt to ask a woman out.”

Hmmmmmm……..I think I need to edit that……..

We’re dating less and thus, marrying less. And the downfall picks up speed with every unworthy woman men meet.

FTFY – Do the world a favour, you dumb bitch; pull your head out of your ass and smell the coffee.

He Turned the Tables on an Inferior Woman

All too often, men are faced with women whom think they are God’s gift to men when in fact they have absolutely zero to offer. Whilst these women think nothing of dismissing men whom they deem to be not good enough for them, it never occurs to said women that they may not be good enough for any man. Occasionally, I come across a story of a man dismissing an inferior woman and it always makes a good read. The latest episode can be found here. Because of the brevity of the link, I’ll post it in its entirety below……..

A couple of days ago I matched with a girl on tinder, hairdresser – I honestly can’t stand hairdressers and their vapid lives/conversations however her pics looked good, added her on FB and she had some pics from a bikini comp, albeit a couple of years old where she looked pretty damn good.

Fast forward to tonight (valentines day) and we meet at a local bar. Straight away I could she had gained a good 10-15kg since her competition days and she was a six at best. However we got a drink and I picked a seat right in front of a tv (cricket was on)

She hit me with a shit test straight away – “what car do you drive ?” At this point I was seething at her deceptive pics so I just said “A 1989 commodore” ( I actually drive a car worth 50k new ) Then said I’m leaving, you are not what I want, I’m out of your league, have a good night, and walked straight out.

Felt fucking good. Not sure if this is TRP worthy but just felt like sharing my experience.”

This was indeed TRP worthy, good friend. Not only did this deceptive cunt have the gall to use photos of herself that she knew were outdated, but she had the sheer temerity to shit test a man she should have known was too good for her. This prime example of a Red Pill man has shown the rest of us how it should be done. If more men did this, the world would be a better place.